YAML vs JSON vs TOML: Complete Configuration Format Comparison

DataFmt Team
#yaml #json #toml #configuration #comparison
5 min read

YAML vs JSON vs TOML: Complete Configuration Format Comparison

Choosing the right configuration format can significantly impact your development workflow. This comprehensive guide compares YAML, JSON, and TOML to help you make the best choice for your project.

Quick Comparison Table

FeatureJSONYAMLTOML
ReadabilityGoodExcellentExcellent
Comments❌ No✅ Yes✅ Yes
Multi-line StringsEscaped✅ Native✅ Native
Learning CurveEasyMediumEasy
Browser Support✅ Native❌ Library❌ Library
Type SafetyGoodLimitedStrong
Use CaseAPIs, DataConfig FilesConfig Files
File SizeSmallMediumMedium
Parsing SpeedVery FastSlowerFast

JSON: The Universal Data Format

Overview

JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) is the most widely used data interchange format. It’s simple, fast, and natively supported by browsers.

JSON Example

{
  "name": "My Application",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "database": {
    "host": "localhost",
    "port": 5432,
    "credentials": {
      "username": "admin",
      "password": "secret123"
    }
  },
  "features": ["authentication", "logging", "caching"],
  "enabled": true,
  "maxConnections": 100
}

JSON Pros

Native Browser Support - JSON.parse() and JSON.stringify() built-in
Fast Parsing - Highly optimized in all languages
Simple Syntax - Easy to learn and understand
Type Safety - Clear data types (string, number, boolean, null)
Universal - Supported everywhere
Machine-Friendly - Easy for computers to parse
Strict Validation - Errors are caught immediately

JSON Cons

No Comments - Can’t add explanations (use separate docs)
No Multi-line Strings - Must use \n for newlines
Trailing Commas - Not allowed, causes errors
Verbose - Requires quotes everywhere
Not Human-Friendly - Hard to read in large configs
No Variables - Can’t reference other values

Best Use Cases for JSON

  • REST APIs - Industry standard for data exchange
  • Data Storage - Simple database exports
  • Configuration - When comments aren’t needed
  • Package Files - package.json, composer.json
  • Data Transfer - Between client and server
  • NoSQL Databases - MongoDB, CouchDB
  • State Management - Redux, Vuex stores

JSON Tools

Validators:

Parsers:

// JavaScript
const data = JSON.parse(jsonString);
const json = JSON.stringify(data, null, 2);

// Python
import json
data = json.loads(json_string)
json_str = json.dumps(data, indent=2)

// PHP
$data = json_decode($json_string);
$json = json_encode($data, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT);

YAML: The Human-Friendly Format

Overview

YAML (YAML Ain’t Markup Language) is designed for human readability with a clean, indentation-based syntax.

YAML Example

name: My Application
version: 1.0.0

database:
  host: localhost
  port: 5432
  credentials:
    username: admin
    password: secret123

features:
  - authentication
  - logging
  - caching

enabled: true
maxConnections: 100

# This is a comment
description: |
  This is a multi-line string.
  It preserves line breaks.
  Perfect for long descriptions.

YAML Pros

Highly Readable - Clean, minimal syntax
Comments Support - Use # for explanations
Multi-line Strings - Native support with | or >
No Quotes Needed - For most strings
Anchors & Aliases - Reuse configuration blocks
Human-Friendly - Easy to write and edit
Less Verbose - No brackets or commas

YAML Cons

Indentation Sensitive - Spaces matter (tabs not allowed)
Complex Spec - Many features can be confusing
Slower Parsing - More complex than JSON
Security Issues - Can execute code if not careful
Type Ambiguity - no can be boolean or string
No Native Browser Support - Needs library

Best Use Cases for YAML

  • Docker Compose - docker-compose.yml
  • Kubernetes - Deployment configs
  • CI/CD Pipelines - GitHub Actions, GitLab CI
  • Application Config - Rails, Symfony
  • Documentation - OpenAPI/Swagger specs
  • Ansible Playbooks - Infrastructure as code
  • CloudFormation - AWS templates

YAML Gotchas

Problem 1: Norway Problem

# ❌ This becomes boolean false!
country: NO

# ✅ Quote it
country: "NO"

Problem 2: Indentation

# ❌ Mixed indentation breaks
settings:
    debug: true
  log: true  # Wrong indent level

# ✅ Consistent spacing
settings:
  debug: true
  log: true

Problem 3: Multi-line Strings

# Preserves newlines
description: |
  Line 1
  Line 2

# Folds into single line
description: >
  This is a very long
  sentence that will be
  folded into one line.

YAML Anchors Example

defaults: &defaults
  timeout: 30
  retries: 3

production:
  <<: *defaults
  host: prod.example.com

development:
  <<: *defaults
  host: localhost
  timeout: 60  # Override default

TOML: The Clear Configuration Format

Overview

TOML (Tom’s Obvious, Minimal Language) is designed to be easy to read and unambiguous, focusing on configuration files.

TOML Example

name = "My Application"
version = "1.0.0"
enabled = true
maxConnections = 100

# This is a comment
[database]
host = "localhost"
port = 5432

[database.credentials]
username = "admin"
password = "secret123"

features = ["authentication", "logging", "caching"]

# Multi-line strings
description = """
This is a multi-line string.
It preserves line breaks.
Perfect for long descriptions.
"""

# Tables
[[servers]]
name = "alpha"
ip = "10.0.0.1"

[[servers]]
name = "beta"
ip = "10.0.0.2"

TOML Pros

Unambiguous - Clear data types, no confusion
Comments Support - Use # for documentation
Multi-line Strings - Triple quotes """
Easy to Read - Clean key = value format
Type Safety - Explicit types (dates, integers, floats)
No Indentation Issues - Uses sections [table]
Fast Parsing - Simpler than YAML

TOML Cons

Less Known - Smaller ecosystem
Verbose for Nested Data - Need [section.subsection]
No Native Browser Support - Needs library
Arrays of Tables - Can be confusing
Limited Tool Support - Compared to JSON/YAML
Not for Data Exchange - Mainly for config

Best Use Cases for TOML

  • Rust Projects - Cargo.toml
  • Python Projects - pyproject.toml
  • Config Files - Application settings
  • Package Managers - Cargo, Poetry
  • Static Site Generators - Hugo
  • Version Control - .gitconfig

TOML Data Types

# String
name = "John"
multiline = """
Multiple
lines
"""

# Integer
age = 30
hex = 0xDEADBEEF
oct = 0o755
bin = 0b11010110

# Float
pi = 3.14159
scientific = 5e+22

# Boolean
enabled = true
disabled = false

# Date/Time
date = 2025-11-10
datetime = 2025-11-10T07:32:00Z

# Array
simple = [1, 2, 3]
mixed = ["red", "blue"]

# Inline Table
point = { x = 1, y = 2 }

Side-by-Side Comparison

Same Data in All Three Formats

JSON:

{
  "server": {
    "host": "localhost",
    "ports": [8080, 8081, 8082],
    "ssl": true
  },
  "database": {
    "connections": 100
  }
}

YAML:

server:
  host: localhost
  ports:
    - 8080
    - 8081
    - 8082
  ssl: true

database:
  connections: 100

TOML:

[server]
host = "localhost"
ports = [8080, 8081, 8082]
ssl = true

[database]
connections = 100

Which Format Should You Choose?

Choose JSON When

✅ You need browser compatibility
✅ Building REST APIs
✅ Speed is critical
✅ Working with JavaScript
✅ Data interchange between systems
✅ Simple data structures
✅ Don’t need comments

Choose YAML When

✅ Human readability is priority
✅ Complex nested configurations
✅ Need comments for documentation
✅ Working with Docker/Kubernetes
✅ CI/CD pipeline configurations
✅ Multi-line strings common
✅ Team is familiar with YAML

Choose TOML When

✅ Clear, unambiguous config files
✅ Rust or Python projects
✅ Need strong type safety
✅ Want simple syntax
✅ Comments are important
✅ Avoid indentation issues
✅ Configuration over data exchange

Performance Comparison

Parsing Speed (relative):

  1. JSON - Fastest (1x baseline)
  2. TOML - Fast (1.5-2x slower)
  3. YAML - Slowest (3-5x slower)

File Size (same data):

  1. JSON - Smallest (100% baseline)
  2. TOML - Medium (110-120%)
  3. YAML - Largest (120-130%)

Note: Differences are negligible for config files but matter for large-scale data processing.

Conversion Between Formats

JSON ↔ YAML

Using yq (YAML processor):

# JSON to YAML
yq -P '.' data.json > data.yaml

# YAML to JSON
yq -o=json '.' data.yaml > data.json

Using Python:

import json
import yaml

# JSON to YAML
with open('data.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
with open('data.yaml', 'w') as f:
    yaml.dump(data, f)

# YAML to JSON
with open('data.yaml') as f:
    data = yaml.safe_load(f)
with open('data.json', 'w') as f:
    json.dump(data, f, indent=2)

JSON ↔ TOML

Using Python:

import json
import toml

# JSON to TOML
with open('data.json') as f:
    data = json.load(f)
with open('data.toml', 'w') as f:
    toml.dump(data, f)

# TOML to JSON
with open('data.toml') as f:
    data = toml.load(f)
with open('data.json', 'w') as f:
    json.dump(data, f, indent=2)

Common Patterns

Environment-Specific Configuration

JSON:

{
  "development": { "debug": true },
  "production": { "debug": false }
}

YAML:

development:
  debug: true

production:
  debug: false

TOML:

[development]
debug = true

[production]
debug = false

Lists and Arrays

JSON:

{
  "items": [
    { "name": "Item 1", "value": 10 },
    { "name": "Item 2", "value": 20 }
  ]
}

YAML:

items:
  - name: Item 1
    value: 10
  - name: Item 2
    value: 20

TOML:

[[items]]
name = "Item 1"
value = 10

[[items]]
name = "Item 2"
value = 20

Try Our Format Tools

Need to work with these formats? Try our free tools:

Summary

Quick Decision Guide:

Use JSON if:

  • ⚡ Speed matters
  • 🌐 Browser/API communication
  • 🔄 Data interchange
  • 📦 Universal compatibility needed

Use YAML if:

  • 📖 Human readability priority
  • 🐳 Docker/Kubernetes configs
  • 🔄 CI/CD pipelines
  • 💬 Comments essential

Use TOML if:

  • 🦀 Rust/Python projects
  • ⚖️ Type safety important
  • 📝 Clear config files
  • 🎯 Avoid ambiguity

Hybrid Approach:

  • Use JSON for APIs and data
  • Use YAML/TOML for configuration
  • Convert between formats as needed

Remember:

  • All three are valid choices
  • Pick based on your use case
  • Be consistent within a project
  • Consider your team’s familiarity

Validate your config files now! 🚀


Need to validate your configuration files? Try our free tools for JSON, YAML, and more!

Found this helpful? Try our free tools!

Explore Our Tools →